https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213829 In a pending company proceeding, a subsequent application need not be accompanied by fresh service on respondents already represented by advocates; service on their counsel is sufficient. Rule 11(b) of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, read with rule 19, requires a judge's summons and service on persons against whom relief is sought, but that requirement is satisfied where parties have already entered appearance through counsel. Fresh notice is needed only for a party previously served but still unrepresented, so that no additional prayer is made without notice and in conformity with natural justice. en-us Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213829 In a pending company proceeding, a subsequent application need not be accompanied by fresh service on respondents already represented by advocates; service on their counsel is sufficient. Rule 11(b) of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, read with rule 19, requires a judge's summons and service on persons against whom relief is sought, but that requirement is satisfied where parties have already entered appearance through counsel. Fresh notice is needed only for a party previously served but still unrepresented, so that no additional prayer is made without notice and in conformity with natural justice. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213829