<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 145 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213825</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in a case involving an application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty by a textile manufacturing company. The adjudicating authority&#039;s decision without waiting for the appellant&#039;s reply violated Tribunal directions and principles of natural justice. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s claim of non-compliance with its directions and directed a fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority, waiving the pre-deposit of dues. The adjudicating authority was instructed to decide the matter afresh within four months, emphasizing compliance with Tribunal directions and proper consideration of evidence in duty evasion cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 145 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213825</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in a case involving an application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty by a textile manufacturing company. The adjudicating authority&#039;s decision without waiting for the appellant&#039;s reply violated Tribunal directions and principles of natural justice. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s claim of non-compliance with its directions and directed a fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority, waiving the pre-deposit of dues. The adjudicating authority was instructed to decide the matter afresh within four months, emphasizing compliance with Tribunal directions and proper consideration of evidence in duty evasion cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>