<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 100 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, setting aside penalties imposed on the appellants due to lack of credible evidence, procedural lapses, and failure to meet the higher standard of proof in quasi-criminal proceedings. The sourced documents were deemed unreliable and lacked corroboration, leading to the dismissal of charges related to clandestine removal of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 100 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, setting aside penalties imposed on the appellants due to lack of credible evidence, procedural lapses, and failure to meet the higher standard of proof in quasi-criminal proceedings. The sourced documents were deemed unreliable and lacked corroboration, leading to the dismissal of charges related to clandestine removal of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>