<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 95 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213775</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived the predeposit of CENVAT Credit of Service Tax and penalty amount, allowing the Appeal against the Order-in-Appeal to proceed. Relying on a judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal held that the Appellant was entitled to claim CENVAT Credit on the Service Tax paid on GTA service as an input service for the specified period. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s Order was set aside, and the Appeal was allowed, affirming the Appellant&#039;s eligibility for the CENVAT Credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 95 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213775</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived the predeposit of CENVAT Credit of Service Tax and penalty amount, allowing the Appeal against the Order-in-Appeal to proceed. Relying on a judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal held that the Appellant was entitled to claim CENVAT Credit on the Service Tax paid on GTA service as an input service for the specified period. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s Order was set aside, and the Appeal was allowed, affirming the Appellant&#039;s eligibility for the CENVAT Credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>