<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 89 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213769</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s writ petition, upholding the Settlement Commission&#039;s order granting immunity from penalty and prosecution for the declared income but clarifying that no immunity extended to income in seized papers not belonging to the petitioner. The court allowed the department to take action against third parties based on the seized documents and imposed costs of Rs. 20,000/- on the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 89 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213769</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s writ petition, upholding the Settlement Commission&#039;s order granting immunity from penalty and prosecution for the declared income but clarifying that no immunity extended to income in seized papers not belonging to the petitioner. The court allowed the department to take action against third parties based on the seized documents and imposed costs of Rs. 20,000/- on the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>