<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 81 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It deleted various additions, including unexplained investments, unaccounted sales, undisclosed interest payments, and unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal remanded certain issues for further inquiry and directed the AO to consider the benefit of telescoping after re-examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 81 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It deleted various additions, including unexplained investments, unaccounted sales, undisclosed interest payments, and unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal remanded certain issues for further inquiry and directed the AO to consider the benefit of telescoping after re-examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>