<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 62 - ITAT, Kolkata</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of Rs 1,28,45,058, concluding that the payments to Alia Transportation and General Trading Co. were legitimate business expenses made for bonafide purposes under the Oil for Food Program, and were not hit by Explanation to Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 62 - ITAT, Kolkata</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of Rs 1,28,45,058, concluding that the payments to Alia Transportation and General Trading Co. were legitimate business expenses made for bonafide purposes under the Oil for Food Program, and were not hit by Explanation to Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>