<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 61 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals partly, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute deductions based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The Tribunal held that disallowances under Sections 43B and 40(a)(ia) should impact the exemption under Section 10B, following the ITAT Hyderabad decision. Disallowances of statutory liabilities under Section 43B were dismissed as the assessee did not press the ground. Disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) were deleted as they were already paid during the year. The Tribunal also rejected the disallowance of various expenses not pressed by the assessee and upheld the disallowance of expenses related to the increase in authorized share capital.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 61 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals partly, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute deductions based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The Tribunal held that disallowances under Sections 43B and 40(a)(ia) should impact the exemption under Section 10B, following the ITAT Hyderabad decision. Disallowances of statutory liabilities under Section 43B were dismissed as the assessee did not press the ground. Disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) were deleted as they were already paid during the year. The Tribunal also rejected the disallowance of various expenses not pressed by the assessee and upheld the disallowance of expenses related to the increase in authorized share capital.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>