<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 59 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213739</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals related to the nature of expenditure on replacement of moulds and dies, affirming that such expenditure was revenue in nature and did not confer enduring benefits. Additionally, the Court upheld the adjustment of losses from the 100% export-oriented unit against other business income under Section 10B for the relevant assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 59 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213739</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals related to the nature of expenditure on replacement of moulds and dies, affirming that such expenditure was revenue in nature and did not confer enduring benefits. Additionally, the Court upheld the adjustment of losses from the 100% export-oriented unit against other business income under Section 10B for the relevant assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>