<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 43 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of service tax and interest, sustained penalties under Section 78 for two appeals, set aside penalties under Section 78 for one appeal, and set aside penalties under Section 77 for all appeals. The appellants&#039; argument of not being a &quot;commercial concern&quot; to avoid service tax liability was rejected as they were found to be engaged in commercial activities based on their annual reports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 43 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of service tax and interest, sustained penalties under Section 78 for two appeals, set aside penalties under Section 78 for one appeal, and set aside penalties under Section 77 for all appeals. The appellants&#039; argument of not being a &quot;commercial concern&quot; to avoid service tax liability was rejected as they were found to be engaged in commercial activities based on their annual reports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>