<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213718</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the assessee&#039;s principal business was granting loans and advances, qualifying for the exclusionary clause in Explanation to Section 73 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, losses from share transactions were not considered speculation losses and could be set off against other income. The appeals were dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213718</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the assessee&#039;s principal business was granting loans and advances, qualifying for the exclusionary clause in Explanation to Section 73 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, losses from share transactions were not considered speculation losses and could be set off against other income. The appeals were dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>