<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 26 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213706</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on H.R. Sheets, M.S. Angles, M.S. Channels, M.S. Beams and M.S. Plates was disputed, and the parties agreed that the issue should be reconsidered in light of cited precedents. The first appellate order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after granting a fair opportunity of hearing and issuing a reasoned, speaking order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 26 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213706</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on H.R. Sheets, M.S. Angles, M.S. Channels, M.S. Beams and M.S. Plates was disputed, and the parties agreed that the issue should be reconsidered in light of cited precedents. The first appellate order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after granting a fair opportunity of hearing and issuing a reasoned, speaking order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>