<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 20 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213700</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants&#039; stay application for the waiver of pre-deposit of a significant Service Tax amount, including Education Cess, interest, and penalties. The confirmation of service tax imposed on the appellants for erection, commission, and installation services was upheld, emphasizing the importance of interpreting works contracts for service tax liability. The jurisdiction issue regarding show cause notices was considered, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellants, highlighting the need for clarity in taxing work contracts. The decision prioritized revenue protection while granting the stay on recovery pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 20 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213700</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants&#039; stay application for the waiver of pre-deposit of a significant Service Tax amount, including Education Cess, interest, and penalties. The confirmation of service tax imposed on the appellants for erection, commission, and installation services was upheld, emphasizing the importance of interpreting works contracts for service tax liability. The jurisdiction issue regarding show cause notices was considered, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellants, highlighting the need for clarity in taxing work contracts. The decision prioritized revenue protection while granting the stay on recovery pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>