<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 13 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213693</link>
    <description>ITAT held in favor of the assessee on multiple counts: weighted deduction under s.35(2AB) allowed for clinical trials/bio-equivalence studies conducted using organizational staff/resources in an approved in-house facility; s.80IC deduction not to be denied by treating Baddi unit sales as deemed inter-unit transfers or by segregating profits; legal/professional expenses for business expansion treated as revenue, not pre-operative capital; product/trademark/patent registration and related support reimbursements held revenue in nature, not depreciable intangible assets. Disallowance under s.14A was remanded to AO. Transfer pricing adjustments were sent back for reconsideration (DRP&#039;s 2% markup left intact). For MAT, provision for doubtful debts added to book profits (against assessee); MAT credit carry-forward remitted to AO for determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 13 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213693</link>
      <description>ITAT held in favor of the assessee on multiple counts: weighted deduction under s.35(2AB) allowed for clinical trials/bio-equivalence studies conducted using organizational staff/resources in an approved in-house facility; s.80IC deduction not to be denied by treating Baddi unit sales as deemed inter-unit transfers or by segregating profits; legal/professional expenses for business expansion treated as revenue, not pre-operative capital; product/trademark/patent registration and related support reimbursements held revenue in nature, not depreciable intangible assets. Disallowance under s.14A was remanded to AO. Transfer pricing adjustments were sent back for reconsideration (DRP&#039;s 2% markup left intact). For MAT, provision for doubtful debts added to book profits (against assessee); MAT credit carry-forward remitted to AO for determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>