<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 7 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213687</link>
    <description>Writ petitions concerning imported goods were disposed of by directing the respondents to adjudicate the matter expeditiously. The petitioners were also required to cooperate in the adjudication process, indicating that the dispute was not finally decided on merits in the writ proceedings and was instead remitted for prompt administrative determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 7 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213687</link>
      <description>Writ petitions concerning imported goods were disposed of by directing the respondents to adjudicate the matter expeditiously. The petitioners were also required to cooperate in the adjudication process, indicating that the dispute was not finally decided on merits in the writ proceedings and was instead remitted for prompt administrative determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>