<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 4 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213684</link>
    <description>A statutory authority must examine the effect of Supreme Court directions, the status of the respondent company, and all relevant material before rejecting an application challenging the maintainability of a reference. Where the authority fails to consider whether the reference has become legally incompetent and whether it still has jurisdiction to proceed, and gives no adequate reasons, the rejection cannot stand. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 4 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213684</link>
      <description>A statutory authority must examine the effect of Supreme Court directions, the status of the respondent company, and all relevant material before rejecting an application challenging the maintainability of a reference. Where the authority fails to consider whether the reference has become legally incompetent and whether it still has jurisdiction to proceed, and gives no adequate reasons, the rejection cannot stand. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>