<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 2 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213682</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on services used for manufacturing goods cleared on job work basis under Notification No. 214/86-CE was held admissible. The Tribunal noted that the issue was already settled by binding precedent, including the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision in Sterlite Industries and the Supreme Court&#039;s principle in Escorts Limited, so the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order allowing credit was sustained. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 15:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 2 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213682</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on services used for manufacturing goods cleared on job work basis under Notification No. 214/86-CE was held admissible. The Tribunal noted that the issue was already settled by binding precedent, including the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision in Sterlite Industries and the Supreme Court&#039;s principle in Escorts Limited, so the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order allowing credit was sustained. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>