<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 513 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213678</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the recipient of GTA services could utilize Cenvat credit for paying Service Tax based on the interpretation of Rule 2(r) and Rule 2(p) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision emphasized the recipient&#039;s liability to pay Service Tax as a provider of taxable service, supported by previous judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 513 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213678</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the recipient of GTA services could utilize Cenvat credit for paying Service Tax based on the interpretation of Rule 2(r) and Rule 2(p) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision emphasized the recipient&#039;s liability to pay Service Tax as a provider of taxable service, supported by previous judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>