<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 501 - ITAT, Hyderabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213666</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the approval conditions were substantially met, emphasizing that minor variations and the sale of a small portion of the area did not violate the approval terms. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 501 - ITAT, Hyderabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213666</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the approval conditions were substantially met, emphasizing that minor variations and the sale of a small portion of the area did not violate the approval terms. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>