https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213649 The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeals for statistical purposes, setting aside the denial of deduction under Section 80-IB for the "Ram Laxman Tower" project and directing reevaluation of indirect expenses for the "Sai Jyot" project. The revenue's appeal, concerning disallowance under Section 40A(2)(b), was dismissed as covered by a previous decision. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s directions based on prior cases and ordered recalculations to avoid double deductions. The decision was issued on 19.10.2011. en-us Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 May 2012 22:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213649 The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeals for statistical purposes, setting aside the denial of deduction under Section 80-IB for the "Ram Laxman Tower" project and directing reevaluation of indirect expenses for the "Sai Jyot" project. The revenue's appeal, concerning disallowance under Section 40A(2)(b), was dismissed as covered by a previous decision. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s directions based on prior cases and ordered recalculations to avoid double deductions. The decision was issued on 19.10.2011. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213649