<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 477 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213641</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that Anti-Dumping Duty was not applicable to the parts of CFLs imported by the appellants, contrary to the Revenue&#039;s claim that duty applied to complete lamps. The decision considered relevant notifications, circulars, and legal precedents, emphasizing that duty did not extend to parts/components of CFLs. This interpretation led to setting aside the duty and penalty imposed on the appellants, providing them with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 477 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213641</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that Anti-Dumping Duty was not applicable to the parts of CFLs imported by the appellants, contrary to the Revenue&#039;s claim that duty applied to complete lamps. The decision considered relevant notifications, circulars, and legal precedents, emphasizing that duty did not extend to parts/components of CFLs. This interpretation led to setting aside the duty and penalty imposed on the appellants, providing them with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>