https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213637 An adjudication order imposing civil consequences was set aside because the noticees had not been given effective opportunity to inspect and receive the relied-upon documents, and the ex parte order was non-speaking, with no discussion of the evidence or reasons supporting the conclusions. The order was also questioned because it was dated 26-5-2010 and attributed to a commissioner who had retired in 2008, with no clear indication of valid earlier signing. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after completion of document inspection, filing of reply, personal hearing, and passing of a speaking order within the stipulated time. en-us Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213637 An adjudication order imposing civil consequences was set aside because the noticees had not been given effective opportunity to inspect and receive the relied-upon documents, and the ex parte order was non-speaking, with no discussion of the evidence or reasons supporting the conclusions. The order was also questioned because it was dated 26-5-2010 and attributed to a commissioner who had retired in 2008, with no clear indication of valid earlier signing. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after completion of document inspection, filing of reply, personal hearing, and passing of a speaking order within the stipulated time. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213637