<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 471 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213635</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding a refund claim of service tax paid for the export of services. The Tribunal found that unjust enrichment does not apply to exported goods and that the grounds for refund must align with the show-cause notice, referencing precedents supporting this view. The decision emphasized the importance of following legal procedures and accurately interpreting relevant provisions in service tax refund and export of services matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 471 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213635</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding a refund claim of service tax paid for the export of services. The Tribunal found that unjust enrichment does not apply to exported goods and that the grounds for refund must align with the show-cause notice, referencing precedents supporting this view. The decision emphasized the importance of following legal procedures and accurately interpreting relevant provisions in service tax refund and export of services matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>