https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213616 The appeal for restoration was dismissed as the main appellant failed to comply with the deposit condition specified by the Tribunal, resulting in the dismissal of all appeals, including that of the present petitioner, under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The request for restoration lacked merit as the petitioner did not fulfill the prerequisite deposit of penalties as required by the Tribunal's order. en-us Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213616 The appeal for restoration was dismissed as the main appellant failed to comply with the deposit condition specified by the Tribunal, resulting in the dismissal of all appeals, including that of the present petitioner, under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The request for restoration lacked merit as the petitioner did not fulfill the prerequisite deposit of penalties as required by the Tribunal's order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213616