<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 447 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213610</link>
    <description>Outdoor canteen or caterer services used for a factory canteen were treated as input service for CENVAT credit because they had a nexus with, and an integral connection to, the manufacture of final products and the business of manufacture. The factory canteen was mandatory under the Factories Act and operated as a welfare measure for workers, which supported the manufacturing activity. An objection that workers bore part of the service cost was not part of the original departmental case and did not change the credit eligibility. The denial of CENVAT credit was therefore unjustified, and the order allowing credit was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 447 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213610</link>
      <description>Outdoor canteen or caterer services used for a factory canteen were treated as input service for CENVAT credit because they had a nexus with, and an integral connection to, the manufacture of final products and the business of manufacture. The factory canteen was mandatory under the Factories Act and operated as a welfare measure for workers, which supported the manufacturing activity. An objection that workers bore part of the service cost was not part of the original departmental case and did not change the credit eligibility. The denial of CENVAT credit was therefore unjustified, and the order allowing credit was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>