<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 433 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213596</link>
    <description>Import of newsprint under an actual-user regime through a handling agent beyond a limited facilitation role was treated as a violation of the import policy, and diversion of goods to persons not entitled to import them supported that finding. Confiscation was confined to the quantity actually seized and available for confiscation, so it could not extend to the full imported quantity where the balance had not been seized. The penalty on one importer was set aside because the notice itself recorded delivery to that entity, while the redemption fine and remaining penalties were reduced to reflect the extent of the proven contravention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 433 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213596</link>
      <description>Import of newsprint under an actual-user regime through a handling agent beyond a limited facilitation role was treated as a violation of the import policy, and diversion of goods to persons not entitled to import them supported that finding. Confiscation was confined to the quantity actually seized and available for confiscation, so it could not extend to the full imported quantity where the balance had not been seized. The penalty on one importer was set aside because the notice itself recorded delivery to that entity, while the redemption fine and remaining penalties were reduced to reflect the extent of the proven contravention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>