<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 421 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld disallowances related to traveling expenses of seconded employees and legal fees paid to Baker &amp;amp; McKinsey. Exemptions under Section 10A were granted for specific units. Various issues were remitted back to the AO for reconsideration or verification. Deductions under Sections 80HHE and 37(1) were allowed, while disallowances under Sections 14A and 92 were either upheld or remitted for re-computation. The treatment of rental income and other miscellaneous income was also addressed. Overall, the assessee&#039;s appeals for certain assessment years were dismissed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were partly allowed for others.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 421 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld disallowances related to traveling expenses of seconded employees and legal fees paid to Baker &amp;amp; McKinsey. Exemptions under Section 10A were granted for specific units. Various issues were remitted back to the AO for reconsideration or verification. Deductions under Sections 80HHE and 37(1) were allowed, while disallowances under Sections 14A and 92 were either upheld or remitted for re-computation. The treatment of rental income and other miscellaneous income was also addressed. Overall, the assessee&#039;s appeals for certain assessment years were dismissed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were partly allowed for others.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>