<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 417 - ITAT, Jaipur</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213580</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various issues, including disallowance of advertising, printing, Diwali, vehicle expenses, depreciation rates, staff welfare expenses, and interest on interest-free loans. Emphasizing the business necessity of expenses and industry competitiveness, the Tribunal followed precedents for consistency. The appeal of the Revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee were partly allowed, reflecting a balanced outcome in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 09:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 417 - ITAT, Jaipur</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213580</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various issues, including disallowance of advertising, printing, Diwali, vehicle expenses, depreciation rates, staff welfare expenses, and interest on interest-free loans. Emphasizing the business necessity of expenses and industry competitiveness, the Tribunal followed precedents for consistency. The appeal of the Revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee were partly allowed, reflecting a balanced outcome in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>