<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 411 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213574</link>
    <description>The appeals were filed against the rejection of refund claims for excess duty paid on Bill of Entry filings. The original authority&#039;s decision was based on the loaded value of imported goods aligning with contemporary import prices. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision without detailed reasoning, leading to a challenge due to lack of justification. The appellant argued the order lacked substance and failed to meet legal justifiability standards. Allegations of procedural unfairness were raised against the original authority, resulting in a remand for a fresh decision with directions to ensure transparency and adherence to natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 411 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213574</link>
      <description>The appeals were filed against the rejection of refund claims for excess duty paid on Bill of Entry filings. The original authority&#039;s decision was based on the loaded value of imported goods aligning with contemporary import prices. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision without detailed reasoning, leading to a challenge due to lack of justification. The appellant argued the order lacked substance and failed to meet legal justifiability standards. Allegations of procedural unfairness were raised against the original authority, resulting in a remand for a fresh decision with directions to ensure transparency and adherence to natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>