<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1204 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213561</link>
    <description>The court decided that property No. 1, Sikandara Road, New Delhi, should be sold to pay off the debts of M/s. Ganga Automobiles Limited (GAL). Mr. G. Sagar Suri had the authority to bind M/s. Delhi Automobiles Ltd. in the sale of the property. GAL and M/s. Delhi Automobiles Ltd. failed to comply with court orders and undertakings, leading to a deemed winding-up order. Attempts to create a third-party interest in the property were deemed to circumvent court orders. Show-cause notices were issued to Directors for false/misleading statements. The court allowed the sale of the property to pay off debts and took action against the Directors for their actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1204 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213561</link>
      <description>The court decided that property No. 1, Sikandara Road, New Delhi, should be sold to pay off the debts of M/s. Ganga Automobiles Limited (GAL). Mr. G. Sagar Suri had the authority to bind M/s. Delhi Automobiles Ltd. in the sale of the property. GAL and M/s. Delhi Automobiles Ltd. failed to comply with court orders and undertakings, leading to a deemed winding-up order. Attempts to create a third-party interest in the property were deemed to circumvent court orders. Show-cause notices were issued to Directors for false/misleading statements. The court allowed the sale of the property to pay off debts and took action against the Directors for their actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>