https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213532 The appeal challenged the Company Law Board's order dismissing a petition under the Companies Act, 1956, as not maintainable. The appellants filed a petition alleging oppression and mismanagement under sections 397 and 398 of the Act. The CLB dismissed the petition due to the appellants' names not appearing in the register of members but granted liberty to file under section 111A for rectification. The judgment allowed the appeal, directing the CLB to accept the amended composite petition, emphasizing the importance of a liberal approach in allowing necessary amendments to determine the real controversy between parties. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213532 The appeal challenged the Company Law Board's order dismissing a petition under the Companies Act, 1956, as not maintainable. The appellants filed a petition alleging oppression and mismanagement under sections 397 and 398 of the Act. The CLB dismissed the petition due to the appellants' names not appearing in the register of members but granted liberty to file under section 111A for rectification. The judgment allowed the appeal, directing the CLB to accept the amended composite petition, emphasizing the importance of a liberal approach in allowing necessary amendments to determine the real controversy between parties. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213532