<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 383 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213530</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters to the original authorities for fresh decisions based on the precedent established in the Ultratech Cement case. The decision emphasized the importance of consistency and adherence to legal principles in determining the eligibility of claiming credit of service tax for paying duty on manufactured goods. The Tribunal also disposed of the stay petition, concluding that specific procedural aspect of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 383 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213530</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters to the original authorities for fresh decisions based on the precedent established in the Ultratech Cement case. The decision emphasized the importance of consistency and adherence to legal principles in determining the eligibility of claiming credit of service tax for paying duty on manufactured goods. The Tribunal also disposed of the stay petition, concluding that specific procedural aspect of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>