https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213526 The court dismissed the revision application concerning a rebate claim for exported goods, which was rejected due to non-compliance with prescribed documentation and original packing requirements. The rejection was upheld based on the failure to meet the conditions under Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.), Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, and Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules. The court emphasized the importance of establishing the duty paid character of exported goods for the admissibility of rebate claims, ultimately affirming the rejection due to non-compliance with legal provisions and export clearance conditions. en-us Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213526 The court dismissed the revision application concerning a rebate claim for exported goods, which was rejected due to non-compliance with prescribed documentation and original packing requirements. The rejection was upheld based on the failure to meet the conditions under Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.), Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, and Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules. The court emphasized the importance of establishing the duty paid character of exported goods for the admissibility of rebate claims, ultimately affirming the rejection due to non-compliance with legal provisions and export clearance conditions. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213526