<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1464 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213517</link>
    <description>A cheque can attract liability only if it is a valid cheque within the meaning of the Negotiable Instruments Act and is drawn in accordance with the authorised mode of operation of the account. Where a company&#039;s account required joint signatures by two authorised signatories, an instrument signed by only one signatory did not satisfy the legal requirements of a valid cheque. On that basis, an essential ingredient of the offence was absent, so the complaints were correctly dismissed and leave to appeal was rightly refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1464 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213517</link>
      <description>A cheque can attract liability only if it is a valid cheque within the meaning of the Negotiable Instruments Act and is drawn in accordance with the authorised mode of operation of the account. Where a company&#039;s account required joint signatures by two authorised signatories, an instrument signed by only one signatory did not satisfy the legal requirements of a valid cheque. On that basis, an essential ingredient of the offence was absent, so the complaints were correctly dismissed and leave to appeal was rightly refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>