<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 367 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under section 263, allowing the appeal to the extent that the Assessing Officer should reframe the assessment as per law, without being bound by specific findings of the CIT. The appeal was allowed to this extent, and the order was pronounced in the open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 367 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under section 263, allowing the appeal to the extent that the Assessing Officer should reframe the assessment as per law, without being bound by specific findings of the CIT. The appeal was allowed to this extent, and the order was pronounced in the open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>