<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 363 - ITAT, Hyderabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213509</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that penalties imposed under S.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were not justified as the assessee was entitled to immunity under clause (2) of Explanation 5. Consequently, penalties for all three years were canceled, and the appeals were partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 363 - ITAT, Hyderabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213509</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that penalties imposed under S.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were not justified as the assessee was entitled to immunity under clause (2) of Explanation 5. Consequently, penalties for all three years were canceled, and the appeals were partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>