<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 352 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, allowing Cenvat credit based on debit notes cum bills, emphasizing compliance with Rule 9(1) requirements. The judgment highlighted the sufficiency of information in the documents, distinguishing past judgments and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 352 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, allowing Cenvat credit based on debit notes cum bills, emphasizing compliance with Rule 9(1) requirements. The judgment highlighted the sufficiency of information in the documents, distinguishing past judgments and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>