<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 337 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213482</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner had disclosed all relevant facts during the original assessment, indicating no failure on their part to fully disclose material facts. Therefore, the court allowed the petition, quashed the notice seeking to reopen the assessment for the year 2004-05, and made the rule absolute accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 337 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213482</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner had disclosed all relevant facts during the original assessment, indicating no failure on their part to fully disclose material facts. Therefore, the court allowed the petition, quashed the notice seeking to reopen the assessment for the year 2004-05, and made the rule absolute accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>