<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 329 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213474</link>
    <description>The appeal was partially allowed by the tribunal, reducing the redemption fine to Rs.40,000/- and the penalty to Rs.25,000/- to facilitate the re-export of hazardous goods. The appellants&#039; challenge to the excessive fine and penalty amounts was upheld, enabling them to proceed with re-exporting the impugned goods held in the CFS. The judgment emphasized the appellants&#039; intention to re-export the goods and the need to alleviate the financial burden imposed by the original authority, ultimately providing a resolution to the issues raised in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 329 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213474</link>
      <description>The appeal was partially allowed by the tribunal, reducing the redemption fine to Rs.40,000/- and the penalty to Rs.25,000/- to facilitate the re-export of hazardous goods. The appellants&#039; challenge to the excessive fine and penalty amounts was upheld, enabling them to proceed with re-exporting the impugned goods held in the CFS. The judgment emphasized the appellants&#039; intention to re-export the goods and the need to alleviate the financial burden imposed by the original authority, ultimately providing a resolution to the issues raised in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>