<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 328 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213473</link>
    <description>The Target Plus Scheme allowed duty credit for imports of freely importable inputs for the importer&#039;s own use or that of supporting manufacturers, and the Handbook required only a broad nexus between the imported goods and the exported product group. The Court held that the Foreign Trade Policy and the corresponding customs exemption notification did not impose any requirement of physical incorporation of the imported input in the export product. The 8 May 2007 circular therefore introduced a substantive restriction not found in the governing policy or notification, was ultra vires, and could not amend them by administrative instruction; the circular and consequential assessment were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 08:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 328 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213473</link>
      <description>The Target Plus Scheme allowed duty credit for imports of freely importable inputs for the importer&#039;s own use or that of supporting manufacturers, and the Handbook required only a broad nexus between the imported goods and the exported product group. The Court held that the Foreign Trade Policy and the corresponding customs exemption notification did not impose any requirement of physical incorporation of the imported input in the export product. The 8 May 2007 circular therefore introduced a substantive restriction not found in the governing policy or notification, was ultra vires, and could not amend them by administrative instruction; the circular and consequential assessment were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>