<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 327 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213471</link>
    <description>The appeal was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI. The appellant&#039;s cenvat credit reversal based on photocopies of invoices was disallowed as it was availed on a reversed cenvat. Additionally, the refund claim for the reversed credit was rejected since the appellant accepted duty liability without the need for a show cause notice, as per Section 11 A (2b) of the Central Excise Act. The judgment emphasized that by accepting duty liability without protest, the appellant fulfilled their obligation, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 327 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213471</link>
      <description>The appeal was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI. The appellant&#039;s cenvat credit reversal based on photocopies of invoices was disallowed as it was availed on a reversed cenvat. Additionally, the refund claim for the reversed credit was rejected since the appellant accepted duty liability without the need for a show cause notice, as per Section 11 A (2b) of the Central Excise Act. The judgment emphasized that by accepting duty liability without protest, the appellant fulfilled their obligation, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>