<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 324 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213468</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals in a case involving a dispute over clandestine clearance of goods. The tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence linking seized documents to clandestine activities, ultimately supporting the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in setting aside the original adjudicating authority&#039;s order. The lack of substantiated proof connecting the documents to clandestine activities led to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeals, highlighting the importance of establishing clear evidence in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 324 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213468</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals in a case involving a dispute over clandestine clearance of goods. The tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence linking seized documents to clandestine activities, ultimately supporting the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in setting aside the original adjudicating authority&#039;s order. The lack of substantiated proof connecting the documents to clandestine activities led to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeals, highlighting the importance of establishing clear evidence in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>