<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 318 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213462</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal confirmed the disallowance of interest expenditure as capitalized but deleted the addition of unaccounted sales. The issue of interest under section 234B was treated as consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 318 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213462</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal confirmed the disallowance of interest expenditure as capitalized but deleted the addition of unaccounted sales. The issue of interest under section 234B was treated as consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>