<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 310 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213454</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that profits from the sale of shares should be treated as Business Income, not Short Term Capital Gain. It affirmed that advances received were not deemed dividends under section 2(22)(e). The Tribunal remanded the section 14A disallowance matter to the Assessing Officer for reassessment in line with the High Court&#039;s ruling on Rule 8D&#039;s retrospective application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 310 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213454</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that profits from the sale of shares should be treated as Business Income, not Short Term Capital Gain. It affirmed that advances received were not deemed dividends under section 2(22)(e). The Tribunal remanded the section 14A disallowance matter to the Assessing Officer for reassessment in line with the High Court&#039;s ruling on Rule 8D&#039;s retrospective application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>