https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213448 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the Assessing Officer to verify the claims related to work-in-progress and retention money. The addition concerning the alleged bogus purchase of Rs. 13,85,600/- was ordered to be deleted, as the Tribunal found the transactions genuine and essential for the project. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of allowing the assessee to present evidence and follow due process in determining tax liabilities. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 May 2012 07:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213448 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the Assessing Officer to verify the claims related to work-in-progress and retention money. The addition concerning the alleged bogus purchase of Rs. 13,85,600/- was ordered to be deleted, as the Tribunal found the transactions genuine and essential for the project. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of allowing the assessee to present evidence and follow due process in determining tax liabilities. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213448