<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 301 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213445</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of the entire diesel quantity and the vessel, with modifications to the fines imposed. The appellant&#039;s acceptance of the adjudged dues for the smuggled diesel precluded further objections. The Chief Engineer&#039;s knowledge of the smuggling was deemed equivalent to the owner&#039;s knowledge, justifying the confiscation under Section 120(2). The appeal was disposed of with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 301 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213445</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of the entire diesel quantity and the vessel, with modifications to the fines imposed. The appellant&#039;s acceptance of the adjudged dues for the smuggled diesel precluded further objections. The Chief Engineer&#039;s knowledge of the smuggling was deemed equivalent to the owner&#039;s knowledge, justifying the confiscation under Section 120(2). The appeal was disposed of with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>