https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213439 Delay in filing a restoration application was condoned where notices and the dismissal order were repeatedly returned undelivered, the factory address had closed, and no attempt was made to serve the disclosed advocate. On that basis, the earlier dismissal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction was recalled and the appeal restored to its original number. The tribunal also directed compliance with the pre-deposit order within the stipulated period and kept recovery in abeyance upon such compliance. en-us Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213439 Delay in filing a restoration application was condoned where notices and the dismissal order were repeatedly returned undelivered, the factory address had closed, and no attempt was made to serve the disclosed advocate. On that basis, the earlier dismissal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction was recalled and the appeal restored to its original number. The tribunal also directed compliance with the pre-deposit order within the stipulated period and kept recovery in abeyance upon such compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213439