https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213435 The court allowed the amendment of the writ petition, emphasizing the necessity for proper adjudication. Despite the petitioners' claims of providing information, the court found delays and dissatisfaction with their conduct. The court rejected arguments regarding the time-limit for submitting information, emphasizing prompt compliance with court orders. A final opportunity was granted for the petitioners to furnish investor information within two weeks, warning of consequences for non-compliance. Concerns about potential misuse of information were addressed, with SEBI assuring its proper use for inquiry purposes. Cooperation and transparency in regulatory investigations were underscored, with a clear deadline set for data submission. en-us Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 May 2012 17:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213435 The court allowed the amendment of the writ petition, emphasizing the necessity for proper adjudication. Despite the petitioners' claims of providing information, the court found delays and dissatisfaction with their conduct. The court rejected arguments regarding the time-limit for submitting information, emphasizing prompt compliance with court orders. A final opportunity was granted for the petitioners to furnish investor information within two weeks, warning of consequences for non-compliance. Concerns about potential misuse of information were addressed, with SEBI assuring its proper use for inquiry purposes. Cooperation and transparency in regulatory investigations were underscored, with a clear deadline set for data submission. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213435