<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 280 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the AO to re-examine issues related to roaming charges under Sections 194J and 194I with technical assistance and verify the claim regarding the non-requirement of TDS if tax has been paid by deductees. The decision upheld the applicability of Section 194H to the discount on prepaid cards, treating it as commission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 22:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 280 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the AO to re-examine issues related to roaming charges under Sections 194J and 194I with technical assistance and verify the claim regarding the non-requirement of TDS if tax has been paid by deductees. The decision upheld the applicability of Section 194H to the discount on prepaid cards, treating it as commission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>