https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213413 The Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to decide on interest claims related to rebate, despite the jurisdiction being ousted for appeals on rebate of duty of excise. All 18 appeals, involving individual amounts less than Rs.50,000, were admitted for hearing due to the recurring nature of the issue. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, granting interest under Section 11BB for delayed refund claims, emphasizing the unconditional nature of interest under Section 11BB regardless of past legal proceedings. The impugned orders denying interest were set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213413 The Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to decide on interest claims related to rebate, despite the jurisdiction being ousted for appeals on rebate of duty of excise. All 18 appeals, involving individual amounts less than Rs.50,000, were admitted for hearing due to the recurring nature of the issue. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, granting interest under Section 11BB for delayed refund claims, emphasizing the unconditional nature of interest under Section 11BB regardless of past legal proceedings. The impugned orders denying interest were set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213413